contrast the core ideas of psychoanalytical, humanistic, and behavioristic theories of personality development, anxiety and anxiety disorders and psychotherap.
Needs to be finished by 12:00 p.m. Eastern time zone 05/08/2016
Hi the assignment is due friday.
opinion of Video
Pick four stages to illustrate early childhood development. Pick two from Erickson’s Stage Theory and two from Piaget’s theory of development. Create one case study for each of the chosen stages, which is a total of four case studies.Label each case study with the theorist/stages relevant to it.Each case study should be a minimum of 250 words.
For each case study, include how you as a therapist would plan to work with someone at the identified stage.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing and a title page is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW THE RUBRIC!
Evaluate the impact the Sociological theories, Functionalism, Conflict, and Interactionism has by choosing oneof the social institution selected from the list below:
Social Institutions (choose one)familyhealth-carereligioneducationmass mediapoliticseconomic
In your paper address the following elements: How does each theory apply to the selected sociological institution? What are the similarities? What are the differences?How does each theory affect the views of the individual who is part of the institution?How does each theory affect the approach to social change within the selected institution?Within the Sociological institution selected, how does each theory affect the views of society?
Writing the Research Paper
The Research Paper: Must be seven to nine double-spaced pages in length, (excluding the cover and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.Must use at least fivescholarly resources, including a minimum of twofrom the Ashford Online Library.Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Prior to engaging in this discussion please read the “Multiple Intelligences” article, read “Chapter 1: In a Nutshell” from Multiple Intelligences, watch the Theory of Multiple Intelligences video, and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. This guidance can be very helpful as it may include strategies that support your preferred learning.
Traditionally, someone who is intelligent is defined as an individual who can solve problems, use logic to answer questions, and think critically. However, psychologist Howard Gardner has created a much broader definition of intelligence called Multiple Intelligences, which is more focused on our areas of learning preferences. For this discussion, please complete the following:
Demonstrate an understanding of intelligence and learning in the framework of Gardner by comparing and contrasting the traditional definition of intelligence (IQ) with the multiple intelligences model. Thinking critically about these difference, comment on how Gardner’s ideas about learning preferences might change the way some assess a person’s strengths and weaknesses. Do these ideas significantly affect this type of evaluation? Apply the principles of multiple intelligences (MI) to the following questions: If you were to assign multiple intelligences to yourself, what would it be, would you assign yourself more than one area, and why?
Which of the MIs do you think are most valued by schools and society? Why?
On what evidence, including personal experiences, do you base your opinions?
If work environments recognized multiple intelligences, how might training, counseling, or classroom activities be revised to address these principles?
How might an understanding of multiple intelligences change the ways in which you view your own abilities or the abilities of your family members, peers, or co-workers?
Prior to engaging in this discussion, please read Chapters 8, 9, and 10 in Applied Metacognition, and review your notes (including those on all articles read in this course about metacognition).
First, reread your posts from the Week One discussions and consider everything you have learned during the past four and a half weeks. Then, apply the knowledge attained from the course to your own development by critically considering the following questions: What did you learn about yourself through the process of learning about learning? What did you learn about your peers in the class through the process of learning about learning? How will you apply what you have learned about yourself in your future learning activities (whether you are the learner or the instructor in these activities)? Describe an event you experienced during the past five weeks in which you noticed learning theory at work. How have your metacognitive experiences in this course influenced your desire to better understand learning in comparison to others? Do you agree or disagree that by applying the elements of metacognition into your studies, you will improve your ability to learn more effectively? Thoroughly explain your reasoning and provide research to support your statements.
PSY 275 Week 2 Anxiety and Stress Disorders Presentation
Create a 15- to 20-minute multimedia presentation–such as slide, tutorial, or video–including speaker notes with cited sources, to teach a population of your choice, discussing the following:
· Describe the population you are presenting to.
· Describe the causes of anxiety, panic, PTSD, and dissociative disorders
· Explain the treatments of anxiety, panic, PTSD, and dissociative disorders
· Describe possible gender and cultural influences of anxiety, panic, PTSD, and dissociative disorders.
Anxiety and Stress Disorders PresentationPSY/275 Version 3
Effect of Drug Use Presentation Select one brain-altering drug—a street drug, a prescription drug, or a legal drug, such as alcohol or tobacco.
Create a 10 or more Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you address the following:Identify your drug and define its primary use in our culture.Identify rates of use and populations affected by using this drug.Discuss the regions of the brain affected by this drug. How does this drug alter brain chemistry?How do high versus low doses of this drug compare in altering behavior, mood, and cognition?Discuss the implications of one-time, casual, or long-term use on the physiology of the brain, and on behavior, mood, and cognition.If a person developed an addiction to the drug you selected, what therapeutic interventions would be used to treat the addiction?
Note. Online students: Include substantive speaker notes No Plagarism Please APA Format
In this assignment, you will read an article about the Mozart effect and identify various parts of the research process. This exercise will help you learn how to read a research article and to understand the research process.
Read the following article:
Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., & Ky, K. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365. 6447: 611. (October 14, 1993). (ProQuest Document ID 76004658).
In your article summary, respond to the following questions:
State the research hypothesis in your own words. Identify the independent and dependent variables. What were some variables the researchers controlled in their study? Why was this necessary? What evidence do the researchers offer as a test of their hypothesis? Is this evidence empirical (observable)? Is it valid? What explanation do the researchers offer for their findings? Does the evidence justify this explanation?
Read the following article:
Jenkins, J.S. (2001). The Mozart effect. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 94, 170-172.
Based on your readings, respond to the following:
Do you think there is any merit in the study (Rauscher, Shaw, & Ky, 1993)? Give three reasons for your position. Does the study take individual differences in spatial ability into account? Explain your answer. What are two ways in which the experiment could be modified to make the results more generalizable?
Write a 5–6-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc.
Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
Accurately identified and described the research hypothesis and variables studied in the research article. Identified any control variables, and explained the necessity of controlling them.
Evaluated validity of the evidence presented as a test of the hypothesis in the research article.
Evaluated interpretation of results in the research article.
Critically assessed the merit of the research study providing at least three reasons.
Evaluated whether the test took into account individual differences in spatial ability giving reasons.
Suggested at least two ways to modify the experiment to make the results more generalizable.
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
your thoughts about how what you have learned might contribute to your effectiveness as a scholar-practitioner working for positive social change.