Read directions attached.

 

Locate and take a free online assessment that uses the Big Five personality factors. https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/IPIP-BFFM/

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper describing your personality traits based on your findings from the Big Five assessment tool. Include the following in your paper: Summarize your results. Propose solutions for working with other personality types using the information from the Big Five assessment and the underlying principles of trait theories. Describe how your results from the assessment compare to the 16 personality factors. Explain how your results are relative to genetics.

Include an introduction and conclusion, and cite at least two sources other than your textbook.

 You will be completing a self-management project in Week 5, and your topic needs to be approved by your instructor to ensure it is behavioral, measurable, and objectively defined. Doing so ensures that you select an appropriate topic but also gets you thinking about how to operationally define behavior.

Choose a target behavior for your Week 5 Self-Management Project.

Write a 175-word summary on the target behavior in observable and measurable terms. Include the methods that will be used to observe and acquire baseline data.

 

  Research the 1976 Trial of Patricia Hearst

 

You are an employee of the Jury Consultation Corporation. Imagine it is 1976, and Patricia Hearst has just been charged with armed robbery. You have been hired by the defense to assist in developing a strategy to help to acquit her.

 

Find answers to the following questions:

 Research the 1976 trial of Patricia Hearst and briefly summarize the case against her. What characteristics does Patricia Hearst possess that could possibly sway a jury in her favor? As a result, what characteristics should her defense attorney look for when selecting a jury? What characteristics does Patricia Hearst possess that could sway a jury against her? As a result, what characteristics should the prosecuting attorney look for when selecting a jury? What type of psychological expert should the defense hire? In other words, what area of psychology should the expert specialize in? Be specific and support your answer.

 

Prepare a PowerPoint presentation, to the client’s attorney explaining your answers to the above questions. Make sure that your report is something that an attorney could use to assist them in developing and trying a case.

 

Use headings, the bold style, and bulleted lists to effectively communicate your findings. You should include detailed speaker notes to assist in your presentation. Please make sure to have at least 10 slides for review. All citations in the report should be in APA 6th edition format.

 

 

Criminal Case

 

Choose one of the roles a forensic psychologist may take in the legal field. Research a specific job that falls in this role (i.e. correctional psychologist, or police psychologist), if you can, find a job description. Note what qualifications are necessary.

 

Write a 3-4 page article for the magazine Psychology Today highlighting this particular job:

 Briefly describe the roles that people in this job may take on. Explain what the career requires you know about the legal system. Discuss any educational requirements of the job. Describe what an undergraduate psychology student may have to do to become eligible for this job.

 

Submit your article in Microsoft Word format. All citations in the article should be in American Psychological Association (APA) 6th edition format. Please make sure to also include a reference page in APA format, but there is no need for a title page in this assignment.

 

 The project is not to be a biography of a theorist. Nor is it simply an overview of some theory. Student papers are to demonstrate a thorough understanding of historical and philosophical roots of a specific theory, relevant modern extensions, and recent empirical support. For example, a student could explore the perspective of evolutionary psychology and elaborate on its philosophical foundations and provide criticism of this approach. Students will explore a perspective in psychology that they are not familiar with or perhaps disagree with. This is an essential critical thinking skill.

 ontological argument (from the nature of God)

teleological argument (from design)

cosmological argument (from processes of change)

causal argument (from processes of causation)

moral argument (from degrees of goodness)

foundationalism

hyperbolic doubt

solipsism

rationalism

empiricism empiricism

existentialism

indirect communication (for Kierkegaard)

aesthetic form of life

ethical form of life

Knight of Faith  

 

1. In what ways did the ideas of the Manichees put Augustine on the path toward truth? How did he eventually come to see their errors?

2. How does Augustine explain the presence of evil in the world? How can it be so prevalent in our experience, if it does not exist independently (as a substance)?

3. What is the source of goodness, according to Augustine (see especially VII)?

4. Augustine describes a time when he understood what is the ultimate good, and yet could not accept God’s grace (see especially VII. 18­19). What does this indicate about the relationship between mind and heart, between intellect and will?

5. Describe some of the ways in which Augustine’s conversion story (VIII. 12) is similar to other famous conversion stories (such as Paul’s, in Acts 9), and some ways in which it is different. 

6. What is time, according to Augustine? Does it exist objectively in the world? (See XI. 14­20)

7. How would Anselm reply to someone who said, “I know perfectly well what you mean when you talk about God, and I also know that there isn’t any such being.”

8. Why does Aquinas think that Anselm’s ontological argument is not available to us? 9. What is the relationship between reason and revelation, according to Aquinas? Is one subordinate to the other?

10. How are essence and existence related in created beings, according to Aquinas? What does this imply about the question of whether the world exists by necessity?

11. Summarize the arguments for God’s existence that Aquinas puts forward: the argument from change, from efficient cause, from possibility and necessity, from the goodness of things, and from design in the world. (The test won’t ask you to summarize all five but might ask for, say, two of them.)

12. How does doubt lead Descartes to certainty? What is it about which he cannot be deceived? 13. Why is Descartes called a foundationalist?

14. How does the conviction that God is not a deceiver help Descartes to establish the reality of an external, material world?

15. How does Descartes argue from the idea of God to the actual existence of God, in Meditation III?

16. How does the distinction between understanding and will explain the possibility of error, for Descartes? How can we avoid error?

17. What is essential to us as persons, according to Descartes? Are we physical bodies? 18. Under what categories does an aesthete (in Kierkegaard’s classification) organize his or her life? How does this differ in the ethical mode?

19. Judge William, writing to A, speaks of his “either/or”. What is that? And how does it mark the difference between A’s form of life and the judge’s?

20. What is the judge’s view of the relation between romantic love and marriage?

21. What is despair? What is the condition of a self when despair is completely eradicated?

22. What is characteristic of a system? What would an existential system be? And how does Kierkegaard attack this notion?

23. “Never at any moment in my life have I ‘sought for God,’” writes Simone Weil (p. 22). Why does she say this? What does it imply about the way in which we come to know God and ourselves?

24. Why is Weil so wary of the church and its “dogma,” its theological teachings? 25. In the essay on “school studies”) Weil writes that “the intelligence can only be led by desire.”

26. How is “every school exercise . . . like a sacrament”? (p. 63)

27. In The Little Logic Book, ch. 13, the authors argue that some purposes are appropriate and others are not in making an argument. Explain what they mean; give examples.

28. “Behind the cases where reasoning with others goes off track, there sometimes lies a moral failure that runs deeper than any logical mistake,” the authors write (p. 192). Explain what this failure is.

29. What is the virtue, in arguing, that represents the mean between excess in either direction? What are the excesses on each side? Explain briefly. The virtue is compromise

The remaining questions are review questions covering several writers. You will be asked to

answer one ortwo of these on the exam. What is important in answering these questions is not to come up with the correct answer – in some cases there really isn’t one – but to explore the

way writers’ ideas relate to each other and to our concerns as we study them.

30. How would Plato, Aristotle and Augustine answer the question that Socrates first posed: what is the best life for a person to live? How do we know that it is the best?

31. In what ways does Kierkegaard’s view of human life, and the choices we make, resemble Augustine’s? In what ways does it differ?

32. Descartes believes we must never act unless we are certain of the principle we are acting on. Kierkegaard, however, believes uncertainty and anxiety are the inevitable conditions of every human choice. Who is right? Or are both partly right?

would like to answer on the final exam. I will consider adding them as optional essay questions.

  TEST 2

argument

premise of an argument

validity

soundness

tautology

contradiction

modus ponens

modus tollens

disjunctive syllogism

hypothetical syllogism fallacy of affirming the consequent

fallacy of denying the antecedent

constructive dilemma

destructive dilemma

(enumerative) induction

method of addition

method of concomitant variation

Whatever phenomenon varies in any manner whenever another phenomenon varies in some particular manner, is either a cause or an effect of that phenomenon, or is connected with it through some fact of causation. ]

method of residues post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy

hasty generalization

slippery slope fallacy

straw person fallacy

begging the question

fallacy of composition

fallacy of division

against the person ( a d hominem)

potentiality:

actuality:

material cause

formal cause efficient cause

final cause

Review questions to help you prepare for the test : Do the premises of a valid deductive argument entail its conclusion?

Can the conclusion of a valid and sound deductive argument be false?

Can the conclusion of a valid but unsound deductive argument be false?

Do the premises of an inductive argument logically entail its conclusion?

Describe how to use a truth table to determine whether a statement is a tautology.

Describe how to use a truth table to determine whether a deductive argument is valid.

The first requirement a strong inductive argument must meet is to identify a genuine pattern. Explain what this means; give an example of an argument that fails this test and one that meets this test. An inductive argument must also be based on the right sort of sample. What does that require? Give an example that meets this test and an example that does not.

Why isn’t it possible to show by inductive arguments that the future will be like the past?

10. Give an example of a causal explanation based on Mill’s methods of agreement and disagreement.

11. What does Mill’s method of concomitant variation (or proportional change) suggest about increases in atmospheric carbon and increasing global average temperature? Does it establish causation conclusively?

12. Give an example of a causal explanation based on Mill’s method of residues (or we could call it “eliminating background factors”). 13. What is the fallacy of false dilemma? How can a valid argument form (“A or B, not A, therefore B”) be labeled an informal fallacy?

14. Give an example of the slippery slope fallacy (you may have heard one or two in high school health class).

15. What is the difference between citing an appropriate authority, in a way that genuinely supports your argument, and falling into the fallacy of appeal to irrelevant authority?

16. Plato believes knowledge must be about a transcendent realm, not about the world of experience. In what way does Aristotle disagree? What is knowledge about, for Aristotle?

17. Why is Aristotle’s understanding of the cosmos called “teleological”?

18. When Aristotle writes about the “unmoved mover,” is this the same as the Christian and Jewish concept of God? In what ways is it different?

 19. What are the three levels of soul that exist in living things? Can they exist apart from the bodies with which they are associated?  20. Why does Aristotle reject the idea that a good life is one devoted to the pursuit of pleasure?

21. What is the arête or excellence of a human being, for Aristotle?

22. Explain what is meant by “choosing the mean” in Aristotle’s ethics.

23. What does the opening page of the Confessions tell us about the relationship between God and man, as Augustine understands it?

What does it mean that our hearts find rest only in God? 24. Cite some of the ways in which Augustine’s early education (learning language, enduring beatings) seem to him to disclose important aspects of human nature.

25. What lesson does Augustine draw from the episode of stealing pears?

26. Why does the bishop (last chapter of Bk III) decline to do as Augustine’s mother asks and instruct him in Christian teaching?

TEST 1 Questions to help in your review of the Platonic dialogues : Why does Socrates reject Euthyphro’s suggestion that “piety” means “approved by all of the

gods”? What is wrong with that definition?

What does the E uthyphro t each us about what Socrates is seeking? Where should we start in our inquiry? What is the goal?

Why does Socrates insist in the A pology that he did not accept payment for his teaching? What group of itinerant teachers is he thinking about, a group in which many people evidently placed him?

What kind of wisdom does Socrates claim to have in the A pology ?

 

5. What does Socrates mean by calling himself a “gadfly” on the body of Athens?

What does Socrates mean when he says in the A pology that a life that is unexamined is not worth living? How does this relate to his insistence on “care for the soul”? What did it imply for the conduct of his own life?

What does Socrates mean when he says in the A pology that a better man cannot be harmed by a worse man? Doesn’t this happen every day—when someone steals a car or betrays a friend?

What does the scene of Socrates’ death in the P haedo show about Socrates’ deepest values? Why does he accept his death so calmly?

What challenge does Thrasymachus throw at Socrates in the opening book of the R epublic?

10. How do Glaucon and Adeimantus make the objection even stronger? What does Plato (appearing as the character Socrates in the dialogue) need to show in order to answer them?

11. Why does Plato turn first to justice in the state, not in the individual? Aren’t they completely different? 12. What is the origin of the state, according to Plato? Why can’t we just live independently?

13. Why should music, drama and poetry be strictly controlled in the guardians’ education?

14. What would Plato say to someone who argues that elementary education should concentrate on math and science, leaving those who are interested to arrange musical and athletic activities if they are interested?

15. What are the three parts of the soul, in the R epublic ? How should they relate to each other?

16. What are the three parts of the ideal city? How should they relate to each other? 17. Has Socrates given us a definition of justice that applies both to individuals and to the state? What is it?

18. Describe the first and second “waves” of opposition that Plato tries to answer in Book V – that his call for equal treatment of men and women is unrealistic, and that the guardians will insist on living with their spouses and children. How does he reply to these objections?

1 9 . W h a t w o u l d b e n e c e s s a r y , a c c o r d i n g t o P l a t o i n B o o k V , t o c r e a t e t h e k a l l i p o l i s , t h e b e s t state?

20. What is the difference between k nowing and merely b elieving something to be true, according to Socrates?

21. Why is knowledge or understanding not possible about the things of ordinary experience? ● we look past the experience to find the form of the experience, to understand why the

22. Draw the “divided line” and identify the four kinds of belief, and the four objects of belief, that fall under each of the four divisions of the line.

 

 23. How does the Form of the Good resemble the sun?

24. How is leaving the cave and emerging into the outside world like philosophical inquiry? Identify at least three parallels that Socrates wants us to notice.

2 5 . I s t h e w o r l d o f o r d i n a r y e x p e r i e n c e o n l y a n i l l u s i o n , a c c o r d i n g t o P l a t o ? D o e s i t h a v e a n y reality?

 

Hi I have hoework its due after 2 hours please start do it.

Thanks!

 

Complete the following using the attached instructions: Choose one of the articles attached to the class activities section; and Write 1 journal article summary Write 1 video summary based on the YouTube selection: Descriptive, Correlational and Experimental Studies  YouTube URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsbK6g10a-c  Instructions for developing the “Journal Article” summary – minimum one page Modified by Dr. Serita Kelsey 5-16-2018

The format of your journal article summary will depend on the article. However, all peer reviewed research articles share the same or very similar components. When preparing to draft your summary, use the key process elements in noted below by including each one in your summary. As a result, your summary will be formatted as follows: Key Process Elements: Overview: Include a statement, followed by information for each of the process elements indicated below. Reason for Writing:

     What is the importance of the research? Why would a reader be interested      in this work?  Problem:

     What problem does this work attempt to solve? What is the scope of the      project? What is the main argument/thesis/claim?  Methodology:

     Describe the specific model(s) or approaches used in the study and/or the      types of evidence used in the research.  Results: Describe the      specific data that indicates the results of the project. Other project/study      results may discuss the findings in a more general way.  Implications:

     What changes should be implemented because of the findings? How does this      work fit in with your future plans? Please remember to include the      citation.

(Adapted with permission from Phil Koopman, “How to Write an Abstract,” http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/essays/abstract.html)

  

Video Summary Instructions 

(one – page)

Revised 5-16-2018

Please follow the format instructions noted below: 

Name:

Assignment:

Date:

Your Video Summary response should include the following queries (double-space): 

ü The overall Video was about…

ü I agreed, question or thought something different because… 

ü Your thoughts – I think this video might apply (now or later) to me or my life (at home, school, socially, or at work) because…. your answer.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper analyzing the biological and humanistic approaches to personality. Your paper should cover the following areas:

Use Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to discuss the extent to which growth needs influence personality formation.

Describe biological factors that influence the formation of personality.

Examine the relationship of biological factors to Maslow’s theory of personality.

Explain the basic aspects of humanistic theory that are incompatible with biological explanations of personality.

Include an introduction and conclusion in your paper.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.